In the context of my art, I challenge the idea of coherent development as a naive illusion that viewers often hold. When I engage in analytical questioning, I attempt to uncover meaning among moments that are fundamentally unrelated. This approach rejects the simple logic of before and after, challenging the notion that a single, unified theme can be developed consistently throughout a body of work.

These moments arise from distinct experiences, emotions, and creative impulses, inherently diverse and independent from one another. Reflected in a multitude of themes and ideas, they do not necessarily connect in a linear or unified manner.

Interpretation is subjective and varies widely among viewers, as each one of us brings our own background, emotions, and understanding, leading to diverse and sometimes conflicting perspectives. We are subjectively diverse, and our experiences highlight the fragmented nature of meaning, where no single, overarching narrative or theme can encompass the entirety of my work. Yet, we exist in the same space, relatively.

This approach aligns with contemporary values, embracing complexity, ambiguity, and multiplicity, simultaneously rejecting and accepting the notion of a singular, cohesive meaning. Employing the rhetorical figure of parataxis, my work juxtaposes distinct elements side by side without subordinating one to another. This technique underscores the fragmentation and independence of each moment, emphasizing the diversity and richness of meaning that arises from their coexistence.